Warisan Sastra Intertestamental Yahudi bagi Doktrin Trinitas Surat Efesus

Paulus Dimas Prabowo

Abstract


The doctrine of the Trinity in the New Testament, especially in Paul's writings, is often thought to have a legacy from Greek culture. However, most of the New Testament writers, including Paul, were first century Jews with Second Temple Period Judaism. Therefore, observations of the doctrine of the Trinity need to look at Jewish intertestamenal literature, including the Apocrypha, Pseudepigrapha, and Qumran Texts which project the thoughts of the Second Temple Period of Judaism. Through thematic and comparative analysis methods, it was found that intertestamental Jewish literature inherited the doctrine of the Trinity in Ephesians in the form of the concept of God as Father, conveying the people as children of God (adopted), the Messiah as Lord and Son of God, the role of Messiah King and Messiah Priest, The dead Messiah, as well as the concept of the Holy Spirit dwelling within the community, provided the impetus for prophecy, as well as being a source of knowledge, guide and protector. Finally, it can be confirmed that Jewish influence is far greater than Greek influence in the doctrine of the Trinity.

Doktrin Trinitas di dalam Perjanjian Baru, khususnya dalam tulisan-tulisan Paulus, sering dianggap memiliki warisan dari budaya Yunani. Namun kebanyakan penulis kitab Perjanjian Baru, termasuk Paulus, merupakan orang-orang Yahudi abad pertama dengan pandangan Second Temple Periode Judaism. Oleh sebab itu, pengamatan terhadap doktrin Trinitas perlu melihat sastra intertestamental Yahudi, meliputi Apokrifa, Pseudepigrafa, dan Teks Qumran yang memproyeksikan pemikiran Second Temple Periode Judaism. Melalui metode analisis tematik dan komparasi, ditemukan bahwa sastra intertestamental Yahudi memberikan warisan terhadap doktrin Trinitas di dalam Surat Efesus berupa konsep Allah sebagai Bapa, pengangkatan umat sebagai anak Allah (adopsi), Mesias sebagai Tuhan dan Anak Allah, peran Mesias Raja dan Mesias Imam, Mesias yang mati, serta konsep Roh Kudus yang berdiam di dalam komunitas, memberi dorongan nubuat, serta sebagai sumber pengetahuan, pembimbing dan pelindung. Akhirnya dapat ditegaskan, bahwa bahwa pengaruh Yahudi jauh lebih besar daripada pengaruh Yunani dalam doktrin Trinitas.


Keywords


sastra intertestamental; surat Efesus; trinitas

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aarde, Timothy van. “The Use of Οἰκονομία for the Missional Plan and Purpose of God in Ephesians 1:3-14.” Missionalia 43, no. 1 (2015): 45–62.

“Apocalypse of Ezra (2 Esdras/4 Ezra),” n.d. https://john-uebersax.com/plato/4Ezra7.htm.

Barth, Markus. “Traditions in Ephesians.” New Testament Studies 30, no. 1 (1984): 3–25.

Beckwith, Roger. “Intertestamental Judaism, Its Literature and Its Significance.” Themelios 15, no. 3 (1990): 77–81.

Bock, Darrell L. Ephesians: An Introduction and Commentary. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2019.

Brijan, Bernice. “Avi We-Elohi: The Divine Father in Pre-Christian Judaism.” Amsterdam, 2014.

Bruce, F.F. “Holy Spirit in the Qumran Texts.” Annual of Leeds University Oriental Society 6 (1968): 49–55.

———. “St. Paul in Rome: 4. The Epistle to the Ephesians.” Bulletin of the John Rylands Library, 1967, 303–22.

Daliman, Muner. “Peran Allah Tritunggal Dalam Karya Keselamatan: Sebuah Refleksi Teologis Efesus 1:3–14.” Immanuel: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen 4, no. 1 (2023): 209–21.

Danker, Frederick William. A Greek-English Lexicon Of The New Testament And Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Ferda, Tucker S. “Naming the Messiah: A Contribution Tothe 4Q246 ‘Son of God’ Debate.” Dead Sea Discoveries 21 (2014): 150–75.

Foundation, The Lockman. “Psalm of Solomon,” n.d. https://qbible-com.translate.goog/brenton-septuagint/psalms-of-solomon.

Friberg, Barbara, Timothy Friberg, and Neva F. Miller. Analytical Lexicon of the Greek New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2000.

Golea, Gabriel. “The New Perspective On Paul: An Objectively Or A Real Challenge For Understanding The Pauline Statements On The Law?” Cernica, 2011.

Grizzle, T. Ephesians: Pentecostal Commentary Series. Dorest: Deo Publishing, 2013.

Gromacki, Gary. “The Plan and Power of God the Father in Ephesians.” Journal of Ministry and Theology 19, no. 2 (2015): 9–52.

Helyer, Larry. “The Necessity, Problems, And Promise Of Second Temple Judaism For Discussions Of New Testament Eschatology.” JETS 47, no. 4 (2004): 597–615.

Hort, F.J.A. Prolegomena to St Paul’s Epistles to the Romans and the Ephesians. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Kassabaum, Jordan. “‘Who Do You Say I Am?’: Second Temple Messianism and the Historical Jesus.” Journal of Undergraduate Research 15, no. 1 (2013): 1–5.

Leighton, Matthew B. “‘MOSAIC COVENANT’ AS A POSSIBLE REFERENT FOR ΝΟΜΟΣ IN PAUL.” Tyndale Bulletin 69, no. 2 (2018): 161–81.

Maguire, Moira, and Brid Delahunt. “Doing a Thematic Analysis: A Practical, Step-by-Step Guide for Learning and Teaching Scholars.” AISHE-J 8, no. 3 (2017): 1–14.

Moskala, Jiri. “The Holy Spirit in the Hebrew Scriptures.” Journal of the Adventist Theological Society 24, no. 2 (2013): 18–58.

Moulton, J. H., and G. Milligan. Vocabulary of the Greek Testament. Charleston, South Carolina: Nabu Press, 2012.

Mowinckel, Sigmund. He That Cometh: The Messiah Concept in the Old Testament and Later Judaism. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2005.

Murdiyanto, Eko. Penelitian Kualitatif: Teori Dan Aplikasi Disertai Contoh Proposal. Yogyakarta: Lembaga Penelitian & PkM UPN ”Veteran” Yogyakarta Press, 2020.

Popović, Mladen. “God the Father in Flavius Josephus.” In The Divine Father: Religious and Philosophical Conceptsof Divine Parenthood in Antiquity, edited by Felix Albrecht and Reinhard Feldmeier, 181–200. Leiden, Boston: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2014.

Pratt, Richard. Ia Berikan Kisah-Nya. Surabaya: Momentum, 2013.

Quesinberry, Kurtes D. “A Hellenist Form Of Ephesians 1:3-14 Subject-Type Isolation And Categorization In The Pauline Texts.” Seoul, 2010.

Reed, Annette Yoshiko. “The Modern Invention of ‘Old Testament Pseudepigrapha.’” Journal of Theological Studies 60, no. 2 (2009): 403–36.

Roberts, Mark D. Ephesians: The Story of God Bible Commentary. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Academic, 2016.

Santrac, Aleksandar S. “Three I Know Not What: The Influence of Greek Philosophy on the Doctrine of Trinity.” In Die Skriflig/ In Luce Verbi 47, no. 1 (2013): 1–7.

Sinyangwe, Brian. “The Trinity and Ecclesiological Foundations: An Exegetical Theological Assessment of Ephesians 2:19-22.” Pan-African Journal of Theology 2, no. 2 (2023): 80–100.

Stead, Christopher. “The Origins of the Doctrine of the Trinity, 2.” Theology 77, no. 653 (1974): 582–88.

Tarasenko, Alexander. “The Messiah’s Portrait in the Literature of the Second Temple Period.” Theological Reflections 11 (2010): 43–54.

“The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament,” n.d. http://www.pseudepigrapha.com/jubilees/1.htm.

Vermes, Geza. The Complete Dead Sea Scrolls in English. London: Penguin Books, 2004.

Wallace, Daniel B. Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics: An Exegetical Syntax of the New Testament with Scripture, Subject, and Greek Word Indexes. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Academic, 1997.

Wijoyo, Sigit. “Kemuliaan Karya Keselamatan Allah Tritunggal: Studi Eksposisi Efesus 1:3-14.” KAPATA: Jurnal Teologi Dan Pendidikan Kristen 1, no. 1 (2020): 40–50.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.53827/lz.v7i1.158

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


LOGON ZOES telah terindeks pada:

      

 

Web Analytics Made Easy - Statcounter

View My Stats